Nissan Qashqai – Pulpaddict

Skoda Elroq review

We spend some quality time with the Skoda Elroq – one of our favourite family EVs on the market…

The last time I tested a Skoda EV was in 2021. It was the impressive Enyaq – the brand’s first electric car.

Apart from a “coupe” version of the Enyaq, there’s been nothing else on the zero-emissions front until the 2025 launch of its little brother, the Elroq.

Priced from a competitive £31,510, it’s about the same size as a Nissan Qashqai, and its many all-electric SUV rivals include everything from the Volvo EX30 and Ford Explorer to the Kia EV3 and Renault Scenic E-Tech.

I’ve just spent a week with the Elroq, and it’s clear that Skoda has another success on its hands.

First impressions are great. It’s a nicely-proportioned, sharp looking car, featuring the Czech manufacturer’s new styling direction called “Modern Solid”, which includes a “Tech-Deck” face.

While it’s shorter than the Enyaq, the Elroq’s wheelbase is almost the same, meaning that there’s ample space front and back for adults.

In fact, right from the moment I adjusted the driving seat, I knew I was going to like the Elroq. Unlike most EVs where I feel perched, I could lower the seat to my preferred position.

Vitally, this ability to sit lower in the car makes you feel more involved in the driving experience.

As you’d expect in a Skoda, there are plenty of smaller storage spaces too, while the boot is a decent 470 litres, expanding to 1,580 litres with the rear sets folded down.

Overall, it’s a stylish, well-built interior, even if it’s on the minimalist side when it comes to the dashboard. Apart from a row of buttons below the air vents, and the multi-function steering wheel, everything is controlled via the central touchscreen.

Swiping and prodding any screen on the move isn’t safe, so sticking essentials such as climate control in there makes no sense. Rant over.

The Elroq is offered in four trims: SE, SE L, Edition and SportLine, plus the performance-focused, range-topping vRS. As well as this, you’ll have to choose from various battery and electric motor configurations.

The options range from the entry-level 50 model with a 52kWh battery and 168bhp motor that produces 310Nm of torque. That’s sufficient for a 0-60mph acceleration time of 8.7 seconds.

Next up is the Elroq 60 with a 59kWh battery, 201bhp motor and 310Nm of torque. That’s good for a 0-60mph sprint of 7.7 seconds.

Then there’s the Elroq 85 complete with a 77kWh battery and 282bhp motor, generating a potent 545Nm of torque, which is enough for a very brisk 0-60mph time of 6.4 seconds.

For the record, the vRS has twin motors and a 5.2-second sprint time.

Finally, it’s worth noting that all Elroq models, except for the vRS, are rear-wheel drive.

It’s no surprise that the Elroq is quick off the mark, but it’s range that matters for most.

Depending on the model chosen, according to the claimed figures, range varies from 232 miles (Elroq SE 50) to 355 miles, for my test car – the Elroq Edition 85.

On the road, the soft suspension gives the Elroq a comfortable if slightly floaty, ride, though it only becomes unsettled over bigger bumps.

Progress is refined and parking is a doddle thanks to light steering, good all-round visibility, a tight turning circle, and the various electronic aids.

Push on and there’s surprisingly little body lean on twisty roads, but it’s clearly set up more for comfort than driving engagement – even with the ability to sit lower in the car.

Also, the brakes are fine, but on the spongey side, while front-end grip is fine in the dry, but might be more challenging in slippery conditions. In other words, it’s at its best cruising along.

If you fancy experimenting, the drive modes available include Normal, Eco, Sport and Individual, which allow for customisation of settings such as engine response, steering and suspension. As ever, Normal offers the best combination of performance and efficiency, while Eco is sensible for long motorway runs and Sport spices things up a little for short bursts.

There also an optional DCC (Dynamic Chassis Control) with Normal, Comfort, Sport and Custom settings. It features adjustable dampers that vary the level of ride firmness, but I suspect most buyers will be happy with the standard-set-up.

All but entry-level models get paddles on the steering wheel to adjust the level of regenerative braking, plus there’s a “B” mode on the gear selector, which is useful for eking out extra miles on long downhill stretches of road, for instance.

A 10-80% rapid charge is possible in around 30 minutes across the line-up, and of course it’ll charge overnight if you have a home connection.

Claimed efficiency for my test car was 4.1 miles per kWh. On a long run I got close to 4.0, and at worst during my week I achieved 3.2. So, driven sensibly, it’s one of the more efficient EVs on the market. In city driving, a range north of 300 miles is possible, but on mixed roads you’re probably looking at a real-world range closer to 275 miles.

Ultimately, the Skoda Elroq is an impressive all-round package and represents great value for money.

Verdict: Skoda has another winner on its hands with the electric Elroq compact SUV. Stylish, spacious, safe, comfortable and easy to drive, it’s affordable and has a decent range.

Skoda UK

Vauxhall Grandland review

We get to grips with the all-electric and mild hybrid versions of Vauxhall’s stylish next-generation Grandland family SUV…

If ever there was a case of a model that’s evolved for the best over the years, it’s the Vauxhall Grandland.

Originally launched in 2017 as the Grandland X, it was facelifted in 2021 (and the ‘X’ was dropped from the name), but it’s fair to say that it was never the most scintillating SUV on the market that.

The all-new second-generation Grandland is still more sensible than scintillating, but it is a more impressive proposition and deserves to be on every family SUV shortlist.

At launch, it’s available as a 100% electric (for the first time) and mild hybrid, with a plug-in hybrid to follow.

Built on the same platform as its Stellantis cousin, the Peugeot 3008, the Grandland is a good-looking, if fairly generic SUV, featuring the latest 3D iteration of Vauxhall’s signature ‘Vizor’ front end, which now houses an illuminated griffin badge and headlight bar.

There’s a central spine running down the bonnet (a nod to Vauxhalls of old) and there’s plenty of lower body cladding right across the car, while the rear gets a full-width light bar separated by lit-up Vauxhall lettering, plus a meaty upper spoiler.

Three trim levels are offered (Design, GS and Ultimate), and if you choose one of the higher specs (GS is expected to be the most popular), you’ll be able to opt for a contrasting roof, which looks much cooler.

It’s also worth mentioning that those cutting-edge headlights are what’s known as Intelli-Lux Pixel Matrix HDs, no less, and they have more than 50,000 elements. They really do bathe the road ahead in light, and the auto high beam function worked efficiently, so I didn’t get flashed once.

Inside, it’s attractive, spacious and well put together, but like most Vauxhalls, it lacks the wow factor of some competitors. The good news is that Vauxhall claims that 85% of the materials use are recyclable.

The size of the infotainment system depends on the trim chosen, so entry-level Design only gets you a 10.0-inch touchscreen, while the GS and Ultimate upgrade to a more impressive 16 inches. Thankfully, Vauxhall has kept some physical short-cut buttons below the screen and the head-up display adjustment toggle is on the door panel in front of the window switches.

The touchscreen is nothing flash in terms of colour and details, but the screen is clear, easy to use and responsive, and naturally there’s DAB radio, sat nav and Bluetooth, plus Android Auto and Apple CarPlay smartphone mirroring.

There are a lot of blacks and greys in the cabin, so it’s a tad dull, and the surfaces are a mix of soft-touch higher up, and scratchy-hard down below.

The seats are comfortable with plenty of adjustment, and there’s more than enough head and leg room in the back for taller adults.

Unlike many of its rivals, the Grandland has the same boot capacity on the mild-hybrid and 100% electric models, with 550 litres on offer (expanding to 1,645 litres with the 40:20:40 split rear bench folded down).

Visibility is mostly good, but the shallow rear window doesn’t offer the best view, which is where the reversing camera and sensors come in.

I tested the Grandland Electric and Grandland Hybrid versions on a mix of roads in Norfolk and Suffolk.

The Grandland Electric is the most impressive of the two. It gets a 73kWh battery mated to a 210bhp electric motor on the front wheels for an impressive WLTP range of up to 325 miles. Rapid charging at speeds of up to 160kW deliver a 10-80% charge in 26 minutes.

It’s also worth noting that it comes with a heat pump, for greater efficiency, as standard, yet it’s an optional extra on some rivals.

A 98kWh battery option will arrive soon, offering a superb official range of 435 miles. The 73kWh Grandland Electric’s performance is fairly sedate by EV standards, but more than enough for everyday driving with a 0-62mph time of nine seconds.

On the road, it feels more substantial than the outgoing model, and there’s a reason for that, because it’s 173mm longer, 64mm wider and 19mm taller – and its lugging around a heavy battery.

It’s fair to say that it’s not the most sophisticated ride, which is on the firm side. That said, while it doesn’t glide over bumps in the road and it’s fidgety at times, there’s decent body control in more challenging corners.

I suspect the big 20-inch wheels on my test car might not have helped with the ride quality, but overall it’s handles decently – it’s just not an engaging driving experience that will put a smile on your face.

On the plus side, its light steering is perfectly suited to urban driving and it’s refined with a whisper quiet e-motor and very little wind noise.

Three drive modes are on offer (Normal, Sport and Eco), but as ever, Sport is fine for fun, short bursts, and Eco further dulls the engagement factor, so best to stay in Normal for the best blend of performance and efficiency.

Thankfully, there are steering wheel paddles, which offer three levels of brake regeneration, so there’s no need to access the touchscreen, but like so many EVs, the brake pedal lacks feel and is spongy.

Officially, energy consumption is 3.6 miles per kWh, and I got pretty close to that, so a real-world range of around 250 miles should be possible – more in city driving and warmer temperatures.

The Grandland Hybrid pairs a 1.2-litre petrol turbo with a 48V hybrid system, giving a total of 134bhp and a 0-62mph sprint of 10.2 seconds.

CO2 emissions are a low 124g/km and Vauxhall claims it can do 51mpg, though we managed around 45mpg.

As mild hybrids go, it works well. It will even run on electric-only power for short periods at slow speeds, which isn’t always the case. Apparently, the electric motor can work up to 84mph and cover 50% of town and city driving.

It seems brisker than the official acceleration figure suggests, and the six-speed dual-clutch transmission and hybrid integration work smoothly. It’s only when pushed that the little three-cylinder makes itself known.

So, the Grandland Hybrid is well suited to urban areas and cruises well enough on faster roads.

But just like its 100% electric sibling, the ride is firm, there’s a fair amount of brake pedal travel and the steering is light, again resulting in a drive that lacks involvement.

Ultimately, it’s unfair to judge the new Grandland too harshly on its driving dynamics because it’s great value compared to some of its rivals and it’s a car that’s more about practicality than performance.

The Grandland Electric is up against the likes of the Tesla Model Y, Skoda Enyaq, Renault Scenic E-Tech, Ford Explorer and Volkswagen ID.4, while the Grandland Hybrid’s competitors include the Peugeot 3008, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sportage and Nissan Qashqai.

And starting at £34,700 (for the Hybrid) and £40,995 (Electric), the Grandland range is competitively priced.

Finally, even though it’s yet to be tested by Euro NCAP for safety, it does come with a comprehensive suite of driver assistance and safety technology as standard.

Verdict: Whether you go for the mild hybrid or 100% electric version, the stylish next-generation Vauxhall Grandland is an honest, sensible, well-equipped family SUV that delivers value for money, space, safety and practicality.

Vauxhall Motors

Subaru Crosstrek review

We spend some quality time with the all-wheel drive Crosstrek SUV – Subaru’s entry-level model…

At first glance, the all-new Subaru Crosstrek looks very much like the Subaru XV – the car it replaces.

There’s a good reason for that, because the Crosstrek is, in effect, the third generation XV. And as it’s already known in North America as the Crosstrek, so the name-change makes sense.

A rugged, raised version of the Impreza five-door hatchback, the Crosstrek has big shoes to fill, because the XV was the left-field brand’s best-selling model.

Frankly, it’s hard to pigeonhole because it is slightly smaller than some family-sized rivals (Kia Sportage) and yet bigger than most compact crossovers (Kia XCeed). Ultimately, it’s the Nissan Qashqai that’s its closest competitor in terms of size.

However, it’s the Crosstrek’s off-road capability that sets it apart. That 220mm of ground clearance is a clue, but hidden from view is Subaru’s signature ‘symmetrical’ four-wheel drive system – one of the best in the business.

Subarus are in their element off-road. Engage ‘X-Mode’ – a drive setting that takes command of the engine, transmission, AWD, brakes and other components to help you navigate challenging terrain – and you’re away.

Despite its sporty looks and regular road tyres, it’s remarkably capable, making mincemeat of deep mud tracks and slippery hills. It should also cope with flooding because of I once drove an XV through a shallow river on an off-roading day.

Priced from a reasonable £34,995, the Crosstrek comes with a 2.0-litre petrol engine that uses Subaru’s trademark ‘Boxer’ flat-four cylinder layout.

It also gets mild hybrid assistance in the form of a small 0.6kWh lithium ion battery and 16bhp electric motor, taking the e-Boxer’s total power output to 134bhp with 184Nm of torque.

Power is sent to all four wheels via Subaru’s Lineartronic CVT automatic gearbox, which is still my biggest bugbear.

Despite the simulated ‘steps’, if you push on, the engine revs uncomfortably high making for noisy progress.

It’s fine at lower speeds and will even run in electric mode for short periods in traffic, but it doesn’t take much provocation for the engine to kick in.

There are paddles behind the steering wheel if you prefer to change gear yourself, but this solution is not hugely effective in practice, so it’s just easier to drive gently.

On paper, the Crosstrek has a 0-62mph acceleration time of 10.8 seconds and a top speed of 123mph, while fuel economy is just 36.8mpg and CO2 emissions are a disappointing 174g/km. On the plus side, I managed around 40mpg in mixed driving.

On the road, the Crosstrek feels substantial and the ride is firm, but thankfully it still manages to soak up most of the lumps and bumps.

The steering is nicely weighted and accurate and there’s surprisingly little body roll in more challenging corners.

Overall, it not as nimble as a standard family hatchback, but it does feel more agile than most SUVs. Crucially though – it won’t put a smile on your face because the CVT neuters the car.

If you prefer a high driving position, then you’ll like the Crosstrek. It’s a tad too commanding for me, but I suspect I’m in the minority.

That said, the seats are comfortable with plenty of adjustment, while the top spec ‘Touring’ trim (the entry-level is ‘Limited’) gets classy leather upholstery which looks like it will be particularly hard-wearing.

There’s an 11.6-inch portrait infotainment screen in the centre console, which does the job, but it’s not exactly cutting edge. What’s more, the ‘Limited’ trim level doesn’t even get integrated sat nav.

Thankfully, some physical buttons have been retained, while the analogue dials for the instruments ahead of the driver look old school.

Overall, the build quality of the interior is good, but it looks a little dated and there are far too many scratchy black surfaces.

There’s a decent amount of space in the back, though taller passengers may struggle for headroom, while the boot is a modest 315 litres (well down on its rivals), expanding to 922 litres with the 60:40-split rear seats flipped down. For the record, the towing capacity is a reasonable 1,270kg.

It’s also worth mentioning that the Crosstrek was awarded a maximum five stars by Euro NCAP and it’s full loaded with safety and driver assistance tech.

So, the Crosstrek 4×4 is a mixed bag, but if you can live with the CVT automatic gearbox, then you’re unlikely to find a more reasonably-priced, trustworthy, go-anywhere automotive companion.

Verdict: The Subaru Crosstrek deserves to be on your SUV shortlist if you want to stand out from the crowd and drive a car that’s safe, dependable and extremely capable when the going gets tough.

Subaru UK

Citroen C5 Aircross Hybrid 136 review

We test the mild hybrid version of Citroen’s comfy family-sized SUV…

How time flies. The first time I drove a Citroen C5 Aircross was way back in 2019, shortly after its UK launch.

At that stage it was available with petrol or diesel power. A plug-in hybrid joined the range in 2022, and now there’s a mild hybrid version – the Aircross ë-series Hybrid 136, to be exact.

The C5 Aircross was also treated to a facelift in 2022 which sharpened up its looks (the front end in particular) and overhauled the dashboard with a new, larger infotainment screen and other tweaks. Ultimately, it’s much the same car, with the focus on comfort above all.

At the heart of the C5 Aircross Hybrid 136 is a heavily revised version of the familiar 1.2-litre three-cylinder PureTech turbo petrol engine (used throughout the Stellantis range, which includes Peugeot, Fiat and Vauxhall) with its power output raised from 130hp to 136hp. The unit is paired with a 48v mild-hybrid electric motor that adds up to 28hp of peak power.

In other words, the small 0.4kWh lithium-ion battery and electric motor assist the petrol engine. It can also be driven on 100% electric power for short distances at low speed (when crawling in traffic or manoeuvring, for instance).

Without getting too technical, the electric motor is integrated into an all-new six-speed dual-clutch transmission, called e-DSC6, which has been designed specifically to work with the hybrid system.

Citroen says it can result in a fuel economy saving of 15% over a regular PureTech 130 petrol (30% in urban areas), with a claimed figure of 53mpg. There’s also a 15% reduction in CO2 emissions (down to 129g/km).

What’s more, Citroen reckons up to 50% of city journeys can be made in electric mode.

In performance terms, all that translates into a 0-62mph sprint time of 10.2 seconds and a 124mph top speed.

Inside it’s very Citroen with an attractive mix of cool design, comfort, space and technology. Equipped with a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster ahead of the driver and an 10-inch HD touchscreen in the centre console as standard, it’s priced from £27,780.

Standard safety and driver assistance technologies include Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) , Active Lane Departure Warning and Active Blind Spot Monitoring, plus three ISOFIX mountings on front passenger and outer rear seats.

Citroen’s ‘Progressive Hydraulic Cushion’ suspension system “for a uniquely smooth and comfortable ride” is fitted across the C5 Aircross range, while the Advanced Comfort seats are well padded and comfy.

It’s practical too with plenty of small storage spaces dotted around the cabin, plus three individual rear seats that slide, fold and recline. There’s also a generous boot volume ranging from 580 litres to 720 litres (depending on the position of the rear seats), expanding to 1,630 litres with the second row seats flipped down.

On the road, the Citroen C5 Aircross Hybrid 136 seems brisker than the stats suggest, thanks to assistance from the electric motor, though the transmission is on the sluggish side at times.

You can hear the thrummy yet willing 1.2-litre engine on start-up, but it soon settles down, and from then on it only becomes vocal under heavy acceleration.

The steering is light and the ride is generally very smooth and comfortable, though it can get a little choppy on really rough surfaces.

At its best cruising along, if you are tempted to push on, there’s surprisingly little body lean in more challenging corners.

Finally, the driving position is on the lofty side, even with the seat at its lowest, while rear seat passengers sit quite high up too, but visibility is good.

The C5 Aircross Hybrid 136’s mild hybrid rivals include the Kia Sportage, Nissan Qashqai and Hyundai Tucson.

Verdict: The Citroen C5 Aircross Hybrid 136 definitely should be on any five-seat family SUV shortlist. Competitively-priced, spacious, economical, packed with safety kit and distinctive, it’s well worth a test drive.

Citroen UK

New Vauxhall Frontera EV and hybrid models will cost the same

Gareth Herincx

16 mins ago
Auto News

In an industry first, Vauxhall has confirmed its new Frontera compact SUV will be launched with price parity for electric and petrol-powered models.

The average list price difference across the wider market between an electric and petrol car is currently 31%. That has been reduced to 0% with the new Frontera.

So, for £23,495, entry-level customers will be able to choose either an EV version with a 111bhp front-mounted electric motor and 44kWh battery, giving a claimed range of up to 186 miles, or a 1.2-litre three-cylinder petrol-electric hybrid with total power of 99bhp.

The hybrid will come with a choice of five or seven seats, while the EV will be a five-seater only. Additionally, a ‘Long Range’ EV version will arrive in 2025 with a range of up to 248 miles.

The Frontera, which is a replacement for the Crossland, will sit between the Mokka and upcoming all-new Grandland in the Vauxhall range.

The launch of the new model also marks the return of the Frontera name, which was originally used on a forgettable SUV in the 1990s.

The all-new Frontera’s many rivals include the Hyundai Kona, MG ZS, Ford Puma, Kia Soul, Dacia Duster and Nissan Qashqai.

Check Also

First Polestar made in America

Production of the all-new Polestar 3 has started in South Carolina, making it the first …