‘69 BOSS 302 ROAD & TRACK MUSTANG

Ford’s new Boss, Bunkie Knudsen, fast-tracked the long-awaited ‘69 BOSS 302 ROAD & TRACK MUSTANG, Dearborn’s Z/28 Camaro challenger.

‘69 BOSS 302 ROAD & TRACK MUSTANG

Mustangs had been on two-year restyling cycles, and there were major changes in 1969. Overall length was increased by almost four inches and width by approximately one-quarter inch. Curb weight was up by 140 pounds. Leading the charge was a portfolio of Mustangs, ranging from the Boss 302, above, photo by Stuart Schorr,  to the R-Code 428 Cobra Jet Ram Air and Boss 429 models. Finally, the Z/28 Camaro would have a serious competitor on the street and in Trans-Am Road racing.

A serious performance car, the ‘69 BOSS 302 ROAD & TRACK MUSTANG was not available with automatic transmission or air conditioning. Its imposing front spoiler was dealer-installed to avoid damage during shipping. The fiberglass rear wing and backlight louvers were optional. Because of its standard F-60 tires, special fender/wheel well contours were required. Ford engineers, working at Kar-Kraft, designed the Boss 302’s HD suspension. Boss 302 Mustangs, priced at approximately $3,500, went on sale in April of 1969, and Ford dealers sold 1,628.

The Boss 302 Mustang showcased the new 302-inch small-block with four-bolt mains, forged steel crank and rods, .524-inch solid-lifter cam, new “Cleveland” canted-valve, big-port heads, and a manually-choked 780-cfm Holley on a high-rise alloy manifold. A factory-installed rev-limiter was set at 6,150 rpm. Like the CJ engine, Ford under-rated the Boss 302 at 290 horsepower at 5,800 rpm to avoid insurance company surcharges for 300-horsepower-and-up cars. There was also a drag strip classification advantage. Stock Boss 302 Mustangs with 3.91 Traction-Lok gears were often quicker and faster than larger-engine Mustangs. Back in the day, well-tuned Boss 302s accelerated to 60 mph in the low sevens with quarter-mile times of high-nineties in the low-mid fourteens.

‘69 BOSS 302 ROAD & TRACK MUSTANGFord’s 1969 seven-car Trans-Am “fleet” was race-prepped by Lee Dykstra’s group at Kar-Kraft, then divided up among its factory teams. Three went to Shelby Racing in Torrance, CA, three to Bud Moore Engineering in Spartanburg, SC, and the remaining car to consummate racer, Smokey Yunick, in Daytona Beach, FL. Bunkie had a long-standing relationship with Smokey, dating back to his Chevrolet days. It was finished and painted with Smokey Yunick’s gold-trimmed black Best Damn Garage in Town livery at Kar-Kraft. For some unexplained reason, it ended up not being raced.

Engines for the seven M-Code Trans-Am Mustangs were developed as part of the Boss 302 “Cleveland” engine program. Ford Engine & Foundry personnel, working in leased space at Kar-Kraft, developed the new small-block that showcased canted-valve, big-port heads. The Boss 302 program development group included Ford’s legendary racing engine engineer, Moses “Mose” Nowland.

“We assembled the race-ready Boss 302 engines for the factory teams at Triple-E (Engine & Foundry Division’s Engine-Electrical-Engineering facility) in Dearborn, adjacent to the Henry Ford Museum. That’s where we built prototype engines for future production and race engines for motorsports teams,” added Nowland, who retired as Senior Motorsport Engineer in 2012. He passed away in 2021.

The blueprinted and balanced Boss 302 Trans-Am engine utilized a cross-drilled, forged steel Indy engine crankshaft, .615-inch lift solid cam, GT40-style forged steel rods, headers, and aluminum intake manifold with individual runners and a pair of Holley Dominator four-barrels. Dyno-tested output was 475-plus horsepower at 9,000 rpm. All race engines were assembled with O-ringed cylinder blocks for dry-deck, gasket-less sealing. The process utilized gas-filled stainless-steel O-rings around the cylinders and Viton rubber rings around water and oil passage openings.

Moore’s Mustangs proved to be faster and more reliable than Shelby’s. It was rumored at the time that Shelby either modified or replaced the Ford-supplied engines. Parnelli Jones won at Michigan International Speedway and Donneybrook, and George Follmer took the win at Bridgehampton. Sam Posey won at Lime Rock, posting the only win for Shelby racing. When SCCA championship points were tallied, Ford unfortunately finished second to Chevrolet…again!

In 1969, I changed the Hi-Performance CARS magazine annual award from Top Performance Car of the Year to Top Performance Manufacturer of the Year, for the first and only time, to honor Ford Division and the ‘69 BOSS 302 ROAD & TRACK MUSTANG. When I presented it to General Manager John Naughton, I said, “The Division deserved the award for its attitudes toward and achievements in the high-performance field. In addition, for its great new engines, drag racing options, specialty cars, and its continued support of racing.”

For details on the ‘69 BOSS 302 ROAD & TRACK MUSTANG, and complete 1969-1969 ½ Mustang lineup including sales brochures, road tests, and Fact Sheets, please visit Over-Drive magazine @

https://over-drive-magazine.com/2023/11/10/1969-ford-mustang-fact-sheet/

’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A – SIX-PACK TO GO!

Created to battle Z/28 Camaros and Boss 302 Mustangs on the road and track, the 340-inch ’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A – SIX-PACK TO GO! proved that less could be more.

’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A - SIX-PACK TO GO!

Both Dodge and Plymouth had been involved in SCCA competitive events since the early to mid-1960s, before the Ponycar explosion and factory participation in Trans-Am racing. SCCA’s 1970 Trans-Am rules allowed carmakers to destroke production engines to meet the series’ 305-cube limit. Chrysler responded with the Challenger T/A and AAR Cuda.

Group 44’s Dodge Dart, campaigned by Bob Tullius and Tony Adamowicz, was a surprise entry in the 1966 Trans-Am series. It garnered a First at Marlboro and a Second at Sebring. Plymouth also participated in the first year of the series with Barracudas driven by Scott Harvey and Bruce Jennings.

The ’70 Challenger T/A and AAR Cuda were powered by a new 10.5-to-1, tri-power 340, underrated at 290 horsepower at 5,000 rpm and 345 pound/feet of torque at 3,400 rpm. They were conceived in the spring of 1969 and materialized as 1970 ½ models. There were no plans for a 1971 model, although dealers did sell new leftovers well into the 1971 model year. Because they were pricey, enthusiasts often opted for more powerful 440 and 426 Street Hemi models for just about the same money. The Challenger T/A we tested for the August 1970 issue of Hi-Performance CARS listed for approximately $4,100.

The T/A and AAR existed because Chrysler wanted to race in Trans-Am. Ford had won the series in 1966 and 1967, and Chevrolet dominated in 1968 and 1969. In April 1969, ACCUS/FIA mandated that, for a specific model to be legal for Trans-Am, the carmaker would have to build one for every two dealerships. Since Chrysler projected losing money on every Challenger T/A and AAR Cuda, they built just enough to qualify – 2,400 T/As and 2,724 AARs. Production started on March 10, 1970, and ended five weeks later.

’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A - SIX-PACK TO GO!

When new, enthusiasts often thought they were just dressed-up Barracudas and Challengers with tri-power engines. They were extensively modified and fitted with an exclusive powerplant, suspension updates, and styling cues. Challengers had a 110-inch wheelbase and overall length of 191 inches, while shorter Cudas had a 108-inch wheelbase and overall length of almost 187 inches.

The engine in our magazine test ’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A – SIX-PACK TO GO! was great. “It was amazingly responsive and was right there up to six grand. Unfortunately, the T/A’s Mickey Mouse tach took a while to catch up to the high-revving engine!”

I loved the way our ’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A – SIX-PACK TO GO! tester, above,  handled. “We found our test T/A with quick-ratio steering, 11-inch rear drum brakes, and 11.3-inch front discs with metallic pads to be controllable and boast fantastic directional stability.”

While much of the AAR and T/A trim differs from that of standard E-body Mopars, it’s the engine that truly defines these cars. Special 340 engines were based on a new beefy block cast with increased webbing to allow for four-bolt mains like those used in destroked race engines. The new heads offered increased breathing, thanks to smoother intake ports. Port-matched intake and exhaust manifolds ensured breathing at high RPM. Production features included an Edelbrock aluminum manifold with three Holley two-barrels and low-restriction throaty duals with side-exit exhausts. The .430/.425-inch lift hydraulic cam and relocated pushrods, special rockers, and Hemi valve springs made 5,500-rpm shift points possible.

Chrysler engineer and Ramchargers member, Dale Reeker designed the hood scoop used exclusively on the T/A. We talked with Reeker when we were driving a T/A at Chelsea. “The ‘Scat Scoop’ is totally functional. It’s located above the slow-moving boundary layer of air, ducting cool air directly to the hood-mated air cleaner. The AAR Cuda has a more traditional hood scoop.”

A lot of effort went into the suspension of these E-body twins. Front suspensions had special K-frames with skid plates and thicker-than-stock torsion and sway bars. Much of the suspension tweaking utilized springs and components from more powerful 440 and 426 Street Hemi models. Torque boxes were welded to the unibody, ahead of the rear leaf springs, for platform strengthening. Even with all the suspension and chassis upgrades, wheel hop was still a problem when launching four-speed cars.

 I loved the way our ’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A - SIX-PACK TO GO! tester handled. “We found our test T/A with quick-ratio steering, 11-inch rear drum brakes, and 11.3-inch front discs with metallic pads to be controllable and boast fantastic directional stability.”In many ways, driving our T/A, above, with close-ratio four-speed and 3.91 Sure-Grip gearing was more fun than driving a heavier 426 Street Hemi Challenger. The T/A offered a much sportier feel, went where you pointed it, and delivered close to big-block performance. My guess was that the 290-horsepower small-block was delivering closer to 335-350 horsepower. Our best 0 to 60 time was 6.2 seconds, certainly on a par with many of the hottest Ponycars. We never made it to the strip because of inclement weather, but the same car later turned 14.0s at almost 100 mph.

Like all professional racecars built off production models, the Autodynamics Challenger T/A and Dan Gurney AAR Cuda racecars had little in common with their donors. Chrysler’s Trans-Am Racing Manager, Pete Hutchinson, shipped three acid-dipped bodies-in-white and four-speeds and Dana rears to All-American Racers. Engine components were shipped to master race engine builder, Keith Black.

Gurney’s AAR built three racecars and shipped one, with a 475-horsepower, 303.8-inch engine, to Ray Caldwell’s Autodynamics for final race prep. The lightened unibody platforms benefited greatly from roll cages that added much-needed structural rigidity. Some cars were fitted with vinyl roof covers for the same reason. Primary drivers for the Chrysler-sponsored teams were Sam Posey at Autodynamics and Swede Savage and Dan Gurney at AAR.

It was a relatively low-budget and not very successful one-year program. The best finishes for Swede Savage were a Second at Elkhart Lake, and for Sam Posey, Thirds at Lime Rock and Elkhart Lake. They didn’t win on Sundays, and dealers didn’t sell T/As and AARs on Monday!

Dodge and Plymouth designed true, head-turning sporty Ponycars. T/As and AARs were fast, had great handling and outperformed more powerful cars. They provided Chrysler the opportunity to showcase its brands in a respected road racing series. Almost half a century later on the historic racing circuit, original Autodynamics T/A and Gurney AAR racecars are still battling Mustangs and Camaros.

For complete details about the ’70 DODGE CHALLENGER T/A – SIX-PACK TO GO! and the complete 1970 Challenger lineup, please visit OVER-DRIVE magazine @ https://over-drive-magazine.com/2024/04/20/1970-dodge-challenger-fact-sheet/

‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLE

Chevrolet was three years late to the Ponycar Party, but the long-hood, short-deck ‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLE made up for lost time!

‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLE

When revealed to the public in the fall of 1966, the all-new Camaro could be ordered with engines up to and including the 350 cubic inch small-block V-8. Soon after the Camaro’s public introduction, there appeared a potent 302-inch small-block in Z28 trim and big-block 396 engines with up to 375 horsepower. And, if that wasn’t enough power, Baldwin- Motion (Baldwin Chevrolet), dana Chevrolet, Nickey Chevrolet and Yenko Chevrolet offered limited-production 427 Camaros in various states of tune.

GM’s F-Body twins, the ‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLE and Pontiac’s Firebird, represented the carmaker’s first venture into Mustang territory. Slightly longer, wider and lower than a Mustang, they introduced new levels of power. While Chevrolet and Pontiac shared a basic platform and much of the sheet metal, including front fenders, door skins and rear quarters, power choices and options were brand-unique. Pontiac relied on a peaked hood, split front grille and GTO-style taillights to set the Firebird apart. When it came to a rear suspension, GM engineers were penny-wise and pound-foolish. They utilized a less-than-desirable monoleaf rear suspension from the Chevy II parts bin.

‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLEAfter the initial ‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLE Public introduction, 302-inch Z/28 small-block and 375 horsepower 396 big-block engines were made available. Even though the Camaro and Firebird shared a common platform and some sheet metal, they looked and drove differently. When presenting the new Firebird, Pontiac took a page from the GTO playbook. Thanks to a myriad of performance, image and comfort and convenience options, buyers could turn a Firebird into anything they wanted.

‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLE

Everything you’ve always wanted to know about the ‘67 CAMARO: PONYCAR WITH MAJOR MUSCLE is available online at Over-Drive Magazine @ https://over-drive-magazine.com/2024/03/22/1967-chevrolet-camaro-fact-sheet/

For more information about Baldwin-Motion SS & Phase III 427 and 454-inch Camaros, check out https://www.amazon.com/Motion-Performance-Tales-Muscle-Builder/dp/0760355606/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1493151743&sr=1-1&keywords=MOTION Performance, Tales of a muscle car builder